PCBenchmark BETA
EN
EnglishEN RomânăRO DeutschDE FrançaisFR EspañolES PortuguêsPT ItalianoIT PolskiPL
Start PC stress test
PCBenchmark/Results/AMD Ryzen 5 3600X + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER browser benchmark
PC SCORE80OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEA
Limited quality run 13 September 2026 · 14:32 EEST

AMD Ryzen 5 3600X+NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

Excellent performance with a strong balance across the measured workloads.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGL 2 ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:45
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU100

Processor throughput

Single thread
1,294.48 Mops/s
Multi thread
9,817.73 Mops/s
Compression proxy
691.8 MB/s
GPU60

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
3,602.9 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
10.8 FPS
Frame time p95
167.60 ms
MEMORY81

System memory

Effective bandwidth
35.00 GB/s
Latency proxy
11.2 ns
Browser RAM class
— GB class
VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

No completed VRAM measurement was recorded for this run.

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

AMD Ryzen 5 3600X comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for nearby desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X12 cores / 24 threads · 2018
    +25.9%higher estimate
  2. AMD Ryzen 9 3900 Processor (OEM Only)12 cores / 24 threads · 2019
    +20.0%higher estimate
  3. AMD Ryzen 7 4700GE (OEM Only)8 cores / 16 threads · 2020
    +2.0%higher estimate
  4. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X6 cores / 12 threads · 2019
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. AMD Ryzen 7 2700E8 cores / 16 threads · 2018
    −6.2%lower estimate
  6. AMD Ryzen 3 3300XZen 2 · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2020
    −16.1%lower estimate
  7. AMD Athlon Gold 3150G (OEM Only)4 cores / 4 threads · 2020
    −31.1%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA P104-100Mining GPUs · 4 GB VRAM · 2017
    +32.4%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060GeForce 20 · 6 GB VRAM · 2019
    +28.2%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 TiGeForce 16 · 6 GB VRAM · 2019
    +8.2%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPERGeForce 16 · 6 GB VRAM · 2019
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPERGeForce 16 · 4 GB VRAM · 2019
    −12.1%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650GeForce 16 · 4 GB VRAM · 2019
    −40.8%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630GeForce 16 · 4 GB VRAM · 2022
    −63.6%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY18.0%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDNO SAMPLE WINDOW45 SEC DROPPED FRAMES81.99%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Linux
Logical processors
12
Browser RAM class
Not disclosed
Graphics API
WebGL 2
Run quality
Limited · 40/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON + 
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 44740,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER",
        "logical_cores": 12,
        "memory_gb": null,
        "platform": "linux",
        "gpu_api": "webgl2",
        "processor_id": 544,
        "graphics_card_id": 2361
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 45,
            "completed": false,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 81.985
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 1294480991.15,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 9817730809.637,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 691.772
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 35.003,
            "latency_ns": 11.234
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 10.819,
            "compute_gflops": 3602.917,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 167.6
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 47.022754,
        "gpu": 6.00486167
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 100,
        "gpu": 60,
        "memory": 81,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 80,
        "grade": "A"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 100,
        "gpu": 60,
        "memory": 81,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 80,
        "grade": "A",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again