PCBenchmark/Results/AMD Ryzen 5 3600X + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT browser benchmark
PC SCORE37OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Fair quality run 7 September 2026 · 11:15 EEST

AMD Ryzen 5 3600X+AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION01:10
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU56

Processor throughput

Single thread
1,278.77 Mops/s
Multi thread
2,131.21 Mops/s
Compression proxy
680.2 MB/s
GPU1

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
172.4 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
0.1 FPS
Frame time p95
0.00 ms
MEMORY77

System memory

Effective bandwidth
30.52 GB/s
Latency proxy
11.7 ns
Browser RAM class
GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
0.03 GB/s
Tested allocation
256 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

AMD Ryzen 5 3600X comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for nearby desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X12 cores / 24 threads · 2018
    +25.9%higher estimate
  2. AMD Ryzen 9 3900 Processor (OEM Only)12 cores / 24 threads · 2019
    +20.0%higher estimate
  3. AMD Ryzen 7 4700GE (OEM Only)8 cores / 16 threads · 2020
    +2.0%higher estimate
  4. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X6 cores / 12 threads · 2019
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. AMD Ryzen 7 2700E8 cores / 16 threads · 2018
    −6.2%lower estimate
  6. AMD Ryzen 3 3300XZen 2 · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2020
    −16.1%lower estimate
  7. AMD Athlon Gold 3150G (OEM Only)4 cores / 4 threads · 2020
    −31.1%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. AMD Radeon Instinct MI300ARadeon Instinct(MIx) · 192 GB VRAM · 2023
    +67.9%higher estimate
  2. AMD Radeon Instinct MI355XRadeon Instinct(MIx) · 288 GB VRAM · 2025
    +61.6%higher estimate
  3. AMD Radeon Instinct MI350XRadeon Instinct(MIx) · 288 GB VRAM · 2025
    +48.2%higher estimate
  4. AMD Radeon RX 9070 XTNavi IV(RX 9000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. AMD Radeon RX 9070Navi IV(RX 9000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    −25.8%lower estimate
  6. AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE 16 GBNavi IV(RX 9000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    −29.6%lower estimate
  7. AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GBNavi IV(RX 9000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    −47.3%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY100.0%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDNO SAMPLE WINDOW70 SEC DROPPED FRAMES0.00%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
2
Browser RAM class
Not disclosed
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Fair · 65/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 69584,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "AMD Ryzen 5 3600X",
        "gpu_name": "AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT",
        "logical_cores": 2,
        "memory_gb": null,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 544,
        "graphics_card_id": 75
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 70,
            "completed": false,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 0
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 1278765821.296,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 2131205208.364,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 680.157
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 30.517,
            "latency_ns": 11.693
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 0.105,
            "compute_gflops": 172.387,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 0
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 256,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 0.032,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 25.31401867,
        "gpu": 0.14365583
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 56,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 77,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 37,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 56,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 77,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 37,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again