PCBenchmark/Results/AMD Ryzen 5 3600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti browser benchmark
PC SCORE79OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEB
Excellent quality run 17 September 2026 · 04:45 EEST

AMD Ryzen 5 3600+NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Very good performance for demanding everyday and creative workloads.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODEQUICK GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:19
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU55

Processor throughput

Single thread
587.80 Mops/s
Multi thread
4,068.10 Mops/s
Compression proxy
819.7 MB/s
GPU100

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
17,201.4 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
130.9 FPS
Frame time p95
7.00 ms
MEMORY86

System memory

Effective bandwidth
42.88 GB/s
Latency proxy
12.3 ns
Browser RAM class
8 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
3.28 GB/s
Tested allocation
128 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Zen 2 desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. AMD Ryzen 9 3900XZen 2 · 12 cores / 24 threads · 2019
    +42.4%higher estimate
  2. AMD Ryzen 7 3700XZen 2 · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2019
    +15.4%higher estimate
  3. AMD Ryzen 5 3600Zen 2 · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2019
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  4. AMD Ryzen 3 3300XZen 2 · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2020
    −11.9%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 TiGeForce 40 · 12 GB VRAM · 2023
    +17.6%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 TiGeForce 30 · 24 GB VRAM · 2022
    +17.3%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090GeForce 30 · 24 GB VRAM · 2020
    +4.3%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 TiGeForce 30 · 12 GB VRAM · 2021
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080GeForce 30 · 10 GB VRAM · 2020
    −12.7%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiGeForce 30 · 8 GB VRAM · 2021
    −36.2%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070GeForce 30 · 8 GB VRAM · 2020
    −40.4%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY96.7%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW19 SEC DROPPED FRAMES3.33%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
12
Browser RAM class
8 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Excellent · 90/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "quick",
    "duration_ms": 19333,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "AMD Ryzen 5 3600",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti",
        "logical_cores": 12,
        "memory_gb": 8,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 41,
        "graphics_card_id": 24
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 19,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 3.329
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 587798460.618,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 4068100354.706,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 819.688
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 42.875,
            "latency_ns": 12.316
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 130.855,
            "compute_gflops": 17201.397,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 7
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 128,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 3.283,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 24.93736158,
        "gpu": 14.3344975
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 55,
        "gpu": 100,
        "memory": 86,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 79,
        "grade": "B"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 55,
        "gpu": 100,
        "memory": 86,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 79,
        "grade": "B",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Quick mode again.

Run it again