PCBenchmark/Results/AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U + radeon (tm) graphics 2.50 browser benchmark
PC SCORE15OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Limited quality run 25 September 2026 · 11:32 EEST

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U+radeon (tm) graphics 2.50

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTRESS GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION03:41
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU20

Processor throughput

Single thread
188.69 Mops/s
Multi thread
1,977.64 Mops/s
Compression proxy
193.7 MB/s
GPU4

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
438.4 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
14.4 FPS
Frame time p95
166.90 ms
MEMORY29

System memory

Effective bandwidth
8.33 GB/s
Latency proxy
104.5 ns
Browser RAM class
8 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
1.51 GB/s
Tested allocation
512 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for nearby desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS8 cores / 16 threads · 2021
    +61.7%higher estimate
  2. AMD Ryzen 5 4500U6 cores / 6 threads · 2020
    +7.3%higher estimate
  3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700C4 cores / 8 threads · 2020
    +1.4%higher estimate
  4. AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U4 cores / 8 threads · 2020
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U4 cores / 8 threads · 2019
    −3.5%lower estimate
  6. AMD Ryzen 5 3500C4 cores / 8 threads · 2020
    −6.7%lower estimate
  7. AMD 7th Gen AMD PRO A6-8350B APU2 cores / 2 threads · 2020
    −25.6%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

radeon (tm) graphics 2.50 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Comparison unavailable
This report has no graphics-card catalog match, so PCBenchmark will not infer a performance tier from its name.

03 / STABILITY24.0%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDNO SAMPLE WINDOW221 SEC DROPPED FRAMES76.05%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
8
Browser RAM class
8 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Limited · 40/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "stress",
    "duration_ms": 220925,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U",
        "gpu_name": "radeon (tm) graphics 2.50",
        "logical_cores": 8,
        "memory_gb": 8,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 519
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 221,
            "completed": false,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 76.046
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 188687452.221,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 1977639258.199,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 193.687
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 8.327,
            "latency_ns": 104.527
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 14.376,
            "compute_gflops": 438.403,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 166.9
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 512,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 1.51,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 8.88891757,
        "gpu": 0.36533583
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 20,
        "gpu": 4,
        "memory": 29,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 15,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 20,
        "gpu": 4,
        "memory": 29,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 15,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Stress mode again.

Run it again