PCBenchmark/Results/AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 browser benchmark
PC SCORE16OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Limited quality run 10 October 2026 · 19:42 EEST

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G+NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTRESS GPU APIWebGL 2 ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION03:53
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU20

Processor throughput

Single thread
275.19 Mops/s
Multi thread
2,207.83 Mops/s
Compression proxy
351.8 MB/s
GPU1

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
126.7 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
0.6 FPS
Frame time p95
748.70 ms
MEMORY41

System memory

Effective bandwidth
10.39 GB/s
Latency proxy
142.0 ns
Browser RAM class
8 GB class
VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

No completed VRAM measurement was recorded for this run.

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for nearby desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. AMD Ryzen 9 5900 (OEM Only)12 cores / 24 threads · 2021
    +55.5%higher estimate
  2. AMD Ryzen 7 5700GE8 cores / 16 threads · 2021
    +34.0%higher estimate
  3. AMD Ryzen 5 5600GE6 cores / 12 threads · 2021
    +19.1%higher estimate
  4. AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G4 cores / 8 threads · 2022
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE4 cores / 8 threads · 2022
    −3.2%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660GeForce 16 · 6 GB VRAM · 2019
    +68.8%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPERGeForce 16 · 6 GB VRAM · 2019
    +68.8%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPERGeForce 16 · 4 GB VRAM · 2019
    +48.3%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650GeForce 16 · 4 GB VRAM · 2019
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 10GbpsGeForce MX(4xx) · 2 GB VRAM · 2020
    −5.4%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA P106-090Mining GPUs · 3 GB VRAM · 2017
    −21.1%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630GeForce 16 · 4 GB VRAM · 2022
    −38.6%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY5.8%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDNO SAMPLE WINDOW233 SEC DROPPED FRAMES94.22%

Why the run quality was reduced

  • The run did not complete; the tab was hidden or a selected stage failed.
  • Many preview frames were dropped, a sign of a contended or throttled device.
  • The laptop ran on battery, which usually lowers performance.
  • The browser reported more threads than the selected CPU has; the selected CPU is probably wrong.
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
12
Browser RAM class
8 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGL 2
Browser
Chrome 154 · Blink engine
Timer resolution
0.100 ms
Memory working set
256 MB
Run quality
Limited · 0/100
Performance index
15.7 · uncapped, 100 = reference
Leaderboard
Ranked
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "stress",
    "duration_ms": 233280,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650",
        "logical_cores": 12,
        "memory_gb": 8,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgl2",
        "browser_engine": "blink",
        "browser_name": "chrome",
        "browser_version": 154,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 0.1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": true,
        "processor_id": 517,
        "graphics_card_id": 11
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 233,
            "completed": false,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 94.222
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 275192261.804,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 2207833594.567,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 351.768
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 10.386,
            "latency_ns": 142.048,
            "working_set_mb": 256
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 0.554,
            "compute_gflops": 126.662,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 748.7
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 12.17208661,
        "gpu": 0.21110333,
        "memory": 0.57765644
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "incomplete",
        "dropped_frames",
        "on_battery",
        "thread_mismatch"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 20,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 41,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 16,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 20,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 41,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 16,
        "performance_index": 15.66,
        "leaderboard_outlier": false,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Stress mode again.

Run it again