PCBenchmark/Results/AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G CPU browser benchmark
CPU CATEGORY SCORE6PARTIAL · OUT OF 100
RUN QUALITY75
Good quality run 7 October 2026 · 22:02 EEST

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G

CPU category score 6/100 from the processor-only suite. This partial result is not a full-system PC Score.

SUITECPU + MEMORY MODESTANDARD GPU APINOT RUN ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION00:28
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU6

Processor throughput

Single thread
138.10 Mops/s
Multi thread
452.35 Mops/s
Compression proxy
107.6 MB/s
GPUNOT RUN

Graphics throughput

This workload was not included in the CPU + Memory suite.

MEMORY33

System memory

Effective bandwidth
10.19 GB/s
Latency proxy
250.8 ns
Browser RAM class
4 GB class
VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

This workload was not included in the CPU + Memory suite.

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for nearby desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. AMD Ryzen 9 5900 (OEM Only)12 cores / 24 threads · 2021
    +55.5%higher estimate
  2. AMD Ryzen 7 5700GE8 cores / 16 threads · 2021
    +34.0%higher estimate
  3. AMD Ryzen 5 5600GE6 cores / 12 threads · 2021
    +19.1%higher estimate
  4. AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G4 cores / 8 threads · 2022
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE4 cores / 8 threads · 2022
    −3.2%lower estimate
03 / RUN QUALITY75.0%

Protocol quality signal

This signal summarizes protocol completion, visible-tab timing and selected-suite capability. It does not invent a graphics stability reading when no GPU workload ran.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW28 SEC RUN QUALITY75/100

Why the run quality was reduced

  • The laptop ran on battery, which usually lowers performance.
  • The browser exposed fewer threads than the selected CPU has, so the multi-core test could not use all of them.
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
CPU + Memory
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
4
Browser RAM class
4 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
NOT RUN
Browser
Edge 154 · Blink engine
Timer resolution
0.100 ms
Memory working set
256 MB
Run quality
Good · 75/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "cpu",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 28068,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G",
        "gpu_name": "AMD Radeon 8040S",
        "logical_cores": 4,
        "memory_gb": 4,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "not_tested",
        "browser_engine": "blink",
        "browser_name": "edge",
        "browser_version": 154,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 0.1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": true,
        "processor_id": 517,
        "graphics_card_id": 2823
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 28,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 0
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 138100319.849,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 452347652.712,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 107.6
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 10.189,
            "latency_ns": 250.811,
            "working_set_mb": 256
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 3.86635752,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": 0.46756793
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "on_battery",
        "thread_cap"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 6,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": 33,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": null,
        "grade": null
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 6,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": 33,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": null,
        "performance_index": null,
        "leaderboard_outlier": false,
        "grade": null,
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same CPU + Memory suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again