PCBenchmark BETA
EN
EnglishEN RomânăRO DeutschDE FrançaisFR EspañolES PortuguêsPT ItalianoIT PolskiPL
Start PC stress test
PCBenchmark/Results/AMD Ryzen 3 3200G with Radeon Vega 8 Graphics + AMD Radeon RX 560 XT browser benchmark
PC SCORE23OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Limited quality run 20 October 2026 · 17:01 EEST

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G with Radeon Vega 8 Graphics+AMD Radeon RX 560 XT

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODEQUICK GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION00:19
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU21

Processor throughput

Single thread
361.96 Mops/s
Multi thread
1,719.06 Mops/s
Compression proxy
453.1 MB/s
GPU1

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
430.5 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
5.7 FPS
Frame time p95
795.30 ms
MEMORY77

System memory

Effective bandwidth
30.64 GB/s
Latency proxy
177.2 ns
Browser RAM class
8 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
5.21 GB/s
Tested allocation
128 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G with Radeon Vega 8 Graphics comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for nearby desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. AMD Ryzen 9 3900 Processor (OEM Only)12 cores / 24 threads · 2019
    +69.5%higher estimate
  2. AMD Ryzen 7 2700E8 cores / 16 threads · 2018
    +32.5%higher estimate
  3. AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE with Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics4 cores / 8 threads · 2018
    +2.7%higher estimate
  4. AMD Ryzen 3 3200G with Radeon Vega 8 Graphics4 cores / 4 threads · 2019
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. AMD Athlon Gold 3150G (OEM Only)4 cores / 4 threads · 2020
    −2.6%lower estimate
  6. AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE4 cores / 4 threads · 2020
    −4.9%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

AMD Radeon RX 560 XT comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. AMD Radeon RX 590Polaris(RX 500) · 8 GB VRAM · 2018
    +62.2%higher estimate
  2. AMD Radeon RX 580Polaris(RX 500) · 8 GB VRAM · 2017
    +40.5%higher estimate
  3. AMD Radeon RX 570Polaris(RX 500) · 4 GB VRAM · 2017
    +15.9%higher estimate
  4. AMD Radeon RX 560 XTPolaris(RX 500) · 4 GB VRAM · 2019
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. AMD Radeon RX 560Polaris(RX 500) · 4 GB VRAM · 2017
    −40.5%lower estimate
  6. AMD Radeon 550Polaris(RX 500) · 2 GB VRAM · 2017
    −72.4%lower estimate
  7. AMD Radeon RX 550Polaris(RX 500) · 2 GB VRAM · 2017
    −72.4%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY9.6%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW19 SEC DROPPED FRAMES90.36%

Why the run quality was reduced

  • Many preview frames were dropped, a sign of a contended or throttled device.
  • The laptop ran on battery, which usually lowers performance.
  • The browser reported more threads than the selected CPU has; the selected CPU is probably wrong.
  • The browser ran the GPU test on a different adapter than the selected graphics card, often the integrated GPU.
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Android
Logical processors
8
Browser RAM class
8 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Browser
Chrome 155 · Blink engine
Timer resolution
0.100 ms
Memory working set
64 MB
Run quality
Limited · 0/100
Performance index
22.6 · uncapped, 100 = reference
Leaderboard
Ranked
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON + 
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "quick",
    "duration_ms": 19090,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "AMD Ryzen 3 3200G with Radeon Vega 8 Graphics",
        "gpu_name": "AMD Radeon RX 560 XT",
        "logical_cores": 8,
        "memory_gb": 8,
        "platform": "android",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "browser_engine": "blink",
        "browser_name": "chrome",
        "browser_version": 155,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 0.1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": true,
        "gpu_vendor": "arm",
        "gpu_architecture": "gen-5",
        "gpu_fallback_adapter": false,
        "processor_id": 484,
        "graphics_card_id": 2426
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 19,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 90.357
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 361959431.072,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 1719064499.389,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 453.138
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 30.635,
            "latency_ns": 177.215,
            "working_set_mb": 64
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 5.742,
            "compute_gflops": 430.492,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 795.3
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 128,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 5.205,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 12.92705719,
        "gpu": 0.35874333,
        "memory": 1.07993337
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "dropped_frames",
        "on_battery",
        "thread_mismatch",
        "gpu_vendor_mismatch"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 21,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 77,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 23,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 21,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 77,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 23,
        "performance_index": 22.62,
        "leaderboard_outlier": false,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Quick mode again.

Run it again