PCBenchmark/Results/AMD Ryzen 3 2300X + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 browser benchmark
PC SCORE21OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Excellent quality run 14 October 2026 · 14:44 EEST

AMD Ryzen 3 2300X+NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODEQUICK GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION00:20
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU25

Processor throughput

Single thread
468.51 Mops/s
Multi thread
1,637.26 Mops/s
Compression proxy
776.8 MB/s
GPU2

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
825.2 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
60.0 FPS
Frame time p95
16.70 ms
MEMORY55

System memory

Effective bandwidth
14.15 GB/s
Latency proxy
113.7 ns
Browser RAM class
16 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
2.05 GB/s
Tested allocation
128 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

AMD Ryzen 3 2300X comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for nearby desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. AMD 7th Gen A12-9800 APU4 cores / 4 threads · 2017
    +6.4%higher estimate
  2. AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE with Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics4 cores / 8 threads · 2018
    +3.9%higher estimate
  3. AMD 7th Gen AMD Athlon X4 9704 cores / 4 threads · 2017
    +3.3%higher estimate
  4. AMD Ryzen 3 2300X4 cores / 4 threads · 2018
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. AMD Ryzen 5 14004 cores / 8 threads · 2017
    −2.8%lower estimate
  6. AMD 7th Gen A10-9700 APU4 cores / 4 threads · 2017
    −3.0%lower estimate
  7. AMD 7th Gen AMD Athlon X4 9504 cores / 4 threads · 2017
    −3.0%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660GeForce 16 · 6 GB VRAM · 2019
    +68.8%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPERGeForce 16 · 6 GB VRAM · 2019
    +68.8%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPERGeForce 16 · 4 GB VRAM · 2019
    +48.3%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650GeForce 16 · 4 GB VRAM · 2019
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 10GbpsGeForce MX(4xx) · 2 GB VRAM · 2020
    −5.4%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA P106-090Mining GPUs · 3 GB VRAM · 2017
    −21.1%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630GeForce 16 · 4 GB VRAM · 2022
    −38.6%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY100.0%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW20 SEC DROPPED FRAMES0.00%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
4
Browser RAM class
16 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Browser
Edge 155 · Blink engine
Timer resolution
0.100 ms
Memory working set
256 MB
Run quality
Excellent · 92/100
Performance index
20.8 · uncapped, 100 = reference
Leaderboard
Not ranked: far from the median of this hardware
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "quick",
    "duration_ms": 19838,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "AMD Ryzen 3 2300X",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650",
        "logical_cores": 4,
        "memory_gb": 16,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "browser_engine": "blink",
        "browser_name": "edge",
        "browser_version": 155,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 0.1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": false,
        "gpu_vendor": "nvidia",
        "gpu_architecture": "turing",
        "gpu_fallback_adapter": false,
        "processor_id": 483,
        "graphics_card_id": 11
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 20,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 0
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 468506013.15,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 1637262352.889,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 776.809
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 14.154,
            "latency_ns": 113.71,
            "working_set_mb": 256
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 60.019,
            "compute_gflops": 825.158,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 16.7
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 128,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 2.051,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 15.65557323,
        "gpu": 0.68763167,
        "memory": 0.76361148
    },
    "quality_flags": [],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 25,
        "gpu": 2,
        "memory": 55,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 21,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 25,
        "gpu": 2,
        "memory": 55,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 21,
        "performance_index": 20.78,
        "leaderboard_outlier": true,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Quick mode again.

Run it again