PCBenchmark/Results/AMD Radeon RX 5500 OEM GPU browser benchmark
GPU CATEGORY SCORE14PARTIAL · OUT OF 100
RUN QUALITY10
Limited quality run 21 October 2026 · 22:55 EEST

AMD Radeon RX 5500 OEM

GPU category score 14/100 from the graphics-only suite. This partial result is not a full-system PC Score.

SUITEGPU MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGL 2 ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION00:19
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPUNOT RUN

Processor throughput

This workload was not included in the GPU suite.

GPU14

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
3,248.9 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
11.4 FPS
Frame time p95
150.00 ms
MEMORYNOT RUN

System memory

This workload was not included in the GPU suite.

VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

This workload was not included in the GPU suite.

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

GPU POSITION

AMD Radeon RX 5500 OEM comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. AMD Radeon RX 5700 XTNavi(RX 5000) · 8 GB VRAM · 2019
    +87.5%higher estimate
  2. AMD Radeon RX 5700Navi(RX 5000) · 8 GB VRAM · 2019
    +52.9%higher estimate
  3. AMD Radeon RX 5600 XTNavi(RX 5000) · 6 GB VRAM · 2020
    +38.3%higher estimate
  4. AMD Radeon RX 5500 OEMNavi(RX 5000) · 4 GB VRAM · 2019
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. AMD Radeon RX 570Polaris(RX 500) · 4 GB VRAM · 2017
    −2.1%lower estimate
  6. AMD Radeon RX 560 XTPolaris(RX 500) · 4 GB VRAM · 2019
    −15.6%lower estimate
  7. AMD Radeon E9390 PCIeEmbedded(9000) · 8 GB VRAM · 2019
    −25.0%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY18.9%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDNO SAMPLE WINDOW19 SEC DROPPED FRAMES81.11%

Why the run quality was reduced

  • The run did not complete; the tab was hidden or a selected stage failed.
  • Many preview frames were dropped, a sign of a contended or throttled device.
  • The browser rounds its timer (privacy mode), so timing is less precise.
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
GPU
Platform family
Linux
Logical processors
4
Browser RAM class
Not disclosed
Graphics API
WebGL 2
Browser
Firefox 153 · Gecko engine
Timer resolution
16.667 ms
Run quality
Limited · 10/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "gpu",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 18517,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "AMD Ryzen 5 3400G with Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics",
        "gpu_name": "AMD Radeon RX 5500 OEM",
        "logical_cores": 4,
        "memory_gb": null,
        "platform": "linux",
        "gpu_api": "webgl2",
        "browser_engine": "gecko",
        "browser_name": "firefox",
        "browser_version": 153,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 16.667,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": null,
        "processor_id": 536,
        "graphics_card_id": 2424
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 19,
            "completed": false,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 81.113
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 11.426,
            "compute_gflops": 3248.859,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 150.003
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": null,
        "gpu": 5.414765,
        "memory": null
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "incomplete",
        "dropped_frames",
        "coarse_timer"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": null,
        "gpu": 14,
        "memory": null,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": null,
        "grade": null
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": null,
        "gpu": 14,
        "memory": null,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": null,
        "performance_index": null,
        "leaderboard_outlier": false,
        "grade": null,
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same GPU suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again