PCBenchmark/Results/AMD FX-8350 with Wraith cooler + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti browser benchmark
PC SCORE18OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Excellent quality run 19 September 2026 · 18:06 EEST

AMD FX-8350 with Wraith cooler+NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTRESS GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION03:38
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU17

Processor throughput

Single thread
212.25 Mops/s
Multi thread
848.62 Mops/s
Compression proxy
357.4 MB/s
GPU11

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
1,287.6 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
59.6 FPS
Frame time p95
16.80 ms
MEMORY35

System memory

Effective bandwidth
4.82 GB/s
Latency proxy
25.1 ns
Browser RAM class
16 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
1.21 GB/s
Tested allocation
512 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

AMD FX-8350 with Wraith cooler comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Comparison unavailable
No sufficiently comparable desktop processors with complete specifications were found in this catalog generation.

GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 TiGeForce 10 · 8 GB VRAM · 2017
    +282.7%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070GeForce 10 · 8 GB VRAM · 2016
    +201.9%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GBGeForce 10 · 6 GB VRAM · 2016
    +104.7%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 TiGeForce 10 · 4 GB VRAM · 2016
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050GeForce 10 · 2 GB VRAM · 2016
    −13.1%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030GeForce 10 · 2 GB VRAM · 2017
    −47.2%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010GeForce 10 · 2 GB VRAM · 2021
    −65.0%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY99.3%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW218 SEC DROPPED FRAMES0.69%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
8
Browser RAM class
16 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Excellent · 99/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "stress",
    "duration_ms": 218035,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "AMD FX-8350 with Wraith cooler",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti",
        "logical_cores": 8,
        "memory_gb": 16,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 416,
        "graphics_card_id": 2
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 218,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 0.691
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 212250482.318,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 848617336.002,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 357.42
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 4.816,
            "latency_ns": 25.072
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 59.603,
            "compute_gflops": 1287.568,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 16.8
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 512,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 1.214,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 7.50814671,
        "gpu": 1.07297333
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 17,
        "gpu": 11,
        "memory": 35,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 18,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 17,
        "gpu": 11,
        "memory": 35,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 18,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Stress mode again.

Run it again