PC SCORE8OUT OF 100

SYSTEM GRADEE

Good quality run 27 September 2026 · 06:26 EEST

AMD 3020e+AMD Radeon 8050S

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:58

Run same suite

01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU10

Processor throughput

Single thread: 195.97 Mops/s
Multi thread: 368.69 Mops/s
Compression proxy: 147.8 MB/s

GPU2

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work: 191.3 G shader ops/s
Render throughput: 6.7 FPS
Frame time p95: 537.00 ms

MEMORY19

System memory

Effective bandwidth: 6.41 GB/s
Latency proxy: 139.6 ns
Browser RAM class: 4 GB class

VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth: 1.05 GB/s
Tested allocation: 384 MB
Validation errors: 0 errors

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for nearby desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

AMD 7th Gen AMD PRO A6-8350B APU2 cores / 2 threads · 2020

+80.6%higher estimate
AMD 7th Gen AMD PRO A4-5350B APU2 cores / 2 threads · 2020

+75.4%higher estimate
AMD Athlon Silver 3050e2 cores / 4 threads · 2020

+23.5%higher estimate
AMD 3020e2 cores / 2 threads · 2020

BASECATALOG REFERENCE

No slower peer is available in this comparison set.

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

AMD Radeon RX 9060Navi IV(RX 9000) · 8 GB VRAM · 2025

+86.8%higher estimate
AMD Radeon RX 7400Navi III(RX 7000) · 8 GB VRAM · 2025

+43.8%higher estimate
AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GBNavi II(RX 6000) · 12 GB VRAM · 2023

+15.2%higher estimate
AMD Radeon 8050SNavi Mobile(RX 8000M) · 2025

BASECATALOG REFERENCE
AMD Radeon RX 6700Navi II(RX 6000) · 10 GB VRAM · 2021

−1.6%lower estimate
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XTNavi II(RX 6000) · 8 GB VRAM · 2022

−5.9%lower estimate
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XTNavi II(RX 6000) · 8 GB VRAM · 2021

−7.6%lower estimate

03 / STABILITY11.2%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW58 SEC DROPPED FRAMES88.76%

04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite: Full system
Platform family: Windows
Logical processors: 2
Browser RAM class: 4 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API: WebGPU
Run quality: Good · 75/100
Score fingerprint: adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale: Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026

BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗

05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +

{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 58225,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "AMD 3020e",
        "gpu_name": "AMD Radeon 8050S",
        "logical_cores": 2,
        "memory_gb": 4,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 248,
        "graphics_card_id": 2824
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 58,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 88.755
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 195969698.696,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 368687698.229,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 147.785
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 6.408,
            "latency_ns": 139.649
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 6.749,
            "compute_gflops": 191.32,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 537
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 384,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 1.054,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 4.36654405,
        "gpu": 0.15943333
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 10,
        "gpu": 2,
        "memory": 19,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 8,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 10,
        "gpu": 2,
        "memory": 19,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 8,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}

SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again