PC SCORE7OUT OF 100

SYSTEM GRADEE

Limited quality run 9 October 2026 · 01:50 EEST

AMD A10-7400P with Radeon R6 Graphics+AMD Radeon R5 M230

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIN/A ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION00:29

Run same suite

01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU5

Processor throughput

Single thread: 125.90 Mops/s
Multi thread: 339.19 Mops/s
Compression proxy: 104.9 MB/s

GPUNOT RUN

Graphics throughput

No completed GPU measurement was recorded for this run.

MEMORY13

System memory

Effective bandwidth: 3.07 GB/s
Latency proxy: 363.1 ns
Browser RAM class: — GB class

VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

No completed VRAM measurement was recorded for this run.

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

Comparison unavailable
No sufficiently comparable desktop processors with complete specifications were found in this catalog generation.

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

AMD Radeon R5 430 OEMArctic Islands(R5 400) · 2 GB VRAM · 2016

+53.8%higher estimate
AMD Radeon R7 430 OEMArctic Islands(R7 400) · 2 GB VRAM · 2016

+53.8%higher estimate
AMD Radeon R7 435 OEMArctic Islands(R7 400) · 2 GB VRAM · 2016

+51.3%higher estimate
AMD Radeon R5 M230Gem System(R5 M200) · 2 GB VRAM · 2014

BASECATALOG REFERENCE

No slower peer is available in this comparison set.

03 / RUN QUALITY10.0%

Protocol quality signal

This signal summarizes protocol completion, visible-tab timing and selected-suite capability. It does not invent a graphics stability reading when no GPU workload ran.

COMPLETEDNO SAMPLE WINDOW29 SEC RUN QUALITY10/100

Why the run quality was reduced

The run did not complete; the tab was hidden or a selected stage failed.
No GPU API was available in this browser.
The browser rounds its timer (privacy mode), so timing is less precise.

04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite: Full system
Platform family: Linux
Logical processors: 4
Browser RAM class: Not disclosed
Graphics API: N/A
Browser: Firefox 157 · Gecko engine
Timer resolution: 16.667 ms
Memory working set: 256 MB
Run quality: Limited · 10/100
Performance index: 7.8 · uncapped, 100 = reference
Leaderboard: Ranked
Score fingerprint: adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale: Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026

BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗

05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +

{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 29067,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "AMD A10-7400P with Radeon R6 Graphics",
        "gpu_name": "AMD Radeon R5 M230",
        "logical_cores": 4,
        "memory_gb": null,
        "platform": "linux",
        "gpu_api": "unavailable",
        "browser_engine": "gecko",
        "browser_name": "firefox",
        "browser_version": 157,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 16.667,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": null,
        "processor_id": 190,
        "graphics_card_id": 1898
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 29,
            "completed": false,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 0
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 125901145.295,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 339194745.701,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 104.856
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 3.071,
            "latency_ns": 363.067,
            "working_set_mb": 256
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 3.3035655,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": 0.18839398
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "incomplete",
        "gpu_unavailable",
        "coarse_timer"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 5,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": 13,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 7,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 5,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": 13,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 7,
        "performance_index": 7.8,
        "leaderboard_outlier": false,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}

SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again