PCBenchmark/Results/amd 4700s 8-Core + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 browser benchmark
PC SCORE26OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Fair quality run 9 October 2026 · 13:42 EEST

amd 4700s 8-Core+NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGL 2 ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION01:00
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU35

Processor throughput

Single thread
450.02 Mops/s
Multi thread
3,822.67 Mops/s
Compression proxy
744.5 MB/s
GPU1

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
159.5 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
0.0 FPS
Frame time p95
0.00 ms
MEMORY64

System memory

Effective bandwidth
24.81 GB/s
Latency proxy
206.4 ns
Browser RAM class
16 GB class
VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

No completed VRAM measurement was recorded for this run.

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

amd 4700s 8-Core comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Comparison unavailable
This report has no processor catalog match, so PCBenchmark will not infer a performance tier from its name.

GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660GeForce 16 · 6 GB VRAM · 2019
    +68.8%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPERGeForce 16 · 6 GB VRAM · 2019
    +68.8%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPERGeForce 16 · 4 GB VRAM · 2019
    +48.3%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650GeForce 16 · 4 GB VRAM · 2019
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 10GbpsGeForce MX(4xx) · 2 GB VRAM · 2020
    −5.4%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA P106-090Mining GPUs · 3 GB VRAM · 2017
    −21.1%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630GeForce 16 · 4 GB VRAM · 2022
    −38.6%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY100.0%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDNO SAMPLE WINDOW60 SEC DROPPED FRAMES0.00%

Why the run quality was reduced

  • The run did not complete; the tab was hidden or a selected stage failed.
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
16
Browser RAM class
16 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGL 2
Browser
Chrome 155 · Blink engine
Timer resolution
0.100 ms
Memory working set
256 MB
Run quality
Fair · 65/100
Performance index
25.9 · uncapped, 100 = reference
Leaderboard
Ranked
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 60164,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "amd 4700s 8-Core",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650",
        "logical_cores": 16,
        "memory_gb": 16,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgl2",
        "browser_engine": "blink",
        "browser_name": "chrome",
        "browser_version": 155,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 0.1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": false,
        "graphics_card_id": 11
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 60,
            "completed": false,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 0
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 450021221.812,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 3822665418.386,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 744.53
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 24.814,
            "latency_ns": 206.385,
            "working_set_mb": 256
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 0.041,
            "compute_gflops": 159.492,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 21.44316559,
        "gpu": 0.26582,
        "memory": 0.89278331
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "incomplete"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 35,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 64,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 26,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 35,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 64,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 26,
        "performance_index": 25.9,
        "leaderboard_outlier": false,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again