PCBenchmark BETA
EN
EnglishEN RomânăRO DeutschDE FrançaisFR EspañolES PortuguêsPT ItalianoIT PolskiPL
Start PC stress test
PCBenchmark/Results/14900HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q browser benchmark
PC SCORE43OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Good quality run 11 September 2026 · 22:41 EEST

14900HX+NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:57
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU69

Processor throughput

Single thread
599.48 Mops/s
Multi thread
7,764.99 Mops/s
Compression proxy
644.0 MB/s
GPU2

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
296.7 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
36.0 FPS
Frame time p95
57.20 ms
MEMORY78

System memory

Effective bandwidth
35.82 GB/s
Latency proxy
31.2 ns
Browser RAM class
32 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
2.90 GB/s
Tested allocation
384 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

14900HX comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Comparison unavailable
This report has no processor catalog match, so PCBenchmark will not infer a performance tier from its name.

GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050GeForce 50 · 8 GB VRAM · 2025
    +45.8%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12 GBGeForce 30 · 12 GB VRAM · 2021
    +41.1%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GBGeForce 30 · 8 GB VRAM · 2022
    +0.8%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-QGeForce 40 Mobile · 8 GB VRAM · 2023
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA RTX A2000 EmbeddedAmpere-MW(Ax000) · 4 GB VRAM · 2022
    −33.2%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA RTX A500 EmbeddedAmpere-MW(Ax000) · 4 GB VRAM · 2022
    −39.4%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA RTX A1000 EmbeddedAmpere-MW(Ax000) · 4 GB VRAM · 2022
    −48.3%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY54.1%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW57 SEC DROPPED FRAMES45.95%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
32
Browser RAM class
32 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Good · 75/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON + 
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 57045,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "14900HX",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q",
        "logical_cores": 32,
        "memory_gb": 32,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "graphics_card_id": 2686
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 57,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 45.946
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 599476011.15,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 7764991429.284,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 644.042
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 35.82,
            "latency_ns": 31.242
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 35.991,
            "compute_gflops": 296.718,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 57.2
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 384,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 2.896,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 31.01849341,
        "gpu": 0.247265
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 69,
        "gpu": 2,
        "memory": 78,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 43,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 69,
        "gpu": 2,
        "memory": 78,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 43,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again